This website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
This Website Uses Cookies By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to our cookie policy. Learn MoreThis website requires certain cookies to work and uses other cookies to help you have the best experience. By visiting this website, certain cookies have already been set, which you may delete and block. By closing this message or continuing to use our site, you agree to the use of cookies. Visit our updated privacy and cookie policy to learn more.
Home » Cross-Examination: Who Is in Charge of Setting Restoration Prices?
“Who is in charge of setting restoration prices?” should not be a trick question, but far too many are confused about the correct answer. The simple reason is because the insurance industry tries to take control of the restoration industry. Part of the reason they do that is because many restorers allow them to do it. The more control is relinquished to insurers, the more they will take and the more that policyholders will suffer. Carriers are required to justify their claims decisions, but many make sweeping denials that are unsupported by their policies or the law.
When restorers allow insurers to make major changes to prices and scopes of work, it creates a serious risk that policyholders will end up with something less than what restorers believe in their professional judgment are the best methods to return properties to their pre-loss condition.